The weirdest newspaper vs. technology argument I’ve ever read, courtesy of some guy who is an Old and writes for some rag*.
A BlackBerry is of limited utility. You cannot have a hearty family breakfast with everyone gathered around the BlackBerry. But with a good newspaper, the president could read the hard-news section, the first lady could adhere to gender orthodoxy and read the softer sections, and the kids could chuckle at the comics. Just as in the old movies, papa could explain things, like what’s the purpose of NATO anymore. (I’m dying to know this myself.) Not all newspapers have comic sections, but even those that don’t usually have sports pages and business columns.
I’ll summarize for ya: print is dying and Barack Obama is killing it with his BlackBerry because he lives in a bubble. Totally! Except, he does read print newspapers and my guess is print is dying because out of touch reporters write dumbed down articles that no one cares about. (And that whole Internet advertising is cheapter thingy, that everyone tried to ignore for years.)
I used to work for a newspaper — I love them. If more of them payed better attention to staying relevant to readers/producing good product, and less attention to the lame-ass “24 Hour New Cycle” I think they’d have a fighting chance.
Then again, I’m just a woman, who prefers “hard” news and is apparently ruining America by forgetting to adhear to gender roles or something.
I guess, my feminist hero Michelle O. and I have something else in common besides our nice rear ends.
(Which BTW Salon? Such a lame article. Of course it’s crass and distasteful to talk about Obama’s ass! For real, what on Earth were you thinking? I didn’t like it when people did this to crazy Palin — the whole sexy bikini thing — and I don’t like it when you do it to my pretend mom Obama either.)
—
*Jokes! WaPo was my “dream” paper. Just like Berkeley was my “dream” school. Life was really super-easy at 16.
